The presence of a utility line and the capacity available are two separate questions
A utility line visible at the site boundary does not establish that the intended use’s utility demand can be met. Based on the projected demand, we request information from providers on connection conditions, the scope of network upgrades and expected deadlines. We distinguish the project’s own tasks from those dependent on another party’s performance. Provider information, reserved capacity and a completed connection represent different stages of readiness; the model records only what the available document actually supports.
We calculate additional costs together with the effect of timing
In the illustrative case, the direct cost of increasing capacity is EUR 200 thousand and the expected delay is three months. In addition to the EUR 200 thousand, the model must reflect later revenue receipts and the extra cost of prolonged preparation or holding the property. We account for the financing impact consistently with the assumptions of the financial model used. The amount and timescale here are assumptions; in an actual transaction they must be supported by quotations, utility provider conditions and a coordinated programme.
Why might an equal price reduction be insufficient?
A price reduction equal to the direct additional cost does not necessarily restore the investor’s required outcome. Acquisition-related expenditure, the timing of costs and receipts and the required return together determine the viable purchase price. We therefore recalculate the entire project using the new data and the same method used to establish the original offer parameters. The revised purchase price limit thus reflects the implications identified, rather than a deduction for a single cost item.
A contingency cannot replace a missing technical answer
If it is not yet known whether the required capacity can be provided at all, an arbitrarily chosen cost contingency cannot resolve the issue. We record confirmation from the utility provider or technical specialist as a condition for proceeding, with a responsible party and deadline. The documents and site access required for each investigation must be defined. The appointed lawyer drafts the contractual arrangements for these conditions, the deadlines and the consequences of non-performance.
When is renegotiation, deferral or withdrawal justified?
Renegotiation is justified if the known additional expenditure and time mean the investor’s objective can no longer be achieved on the current terms, but those terms can be changed. If the availability of capacity remains unclear, we make the decision conditional on the necessary evidence. If capacity or funding cannot be secured, or risk cannot be reduced to an acceptable level, we recommend declining the transaction. The conclusion states the calculated purchase-price ceiling separately from conditions that a financial concession alone cannot resolve.
The examples are illustrative and do not describe client projects.
Related service →